Ukraine continues its journey towards the European Union, facing important tasks and challenges, including the fight against corruption and the strengthening of democratic institutions. However, recent events related to allegations against the head of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy in fraudulent schemes have sparked serious discussion and mixed reactions from the public.

During a state of war, it is unquestionably expected that the government takes decisive steps in combating corruption and fraud. However, it is important to maintain a balance between this fight and the adherence to principles of justice and legality. Accusing an official of actions that occurred before their appointment may appear as an attempt at political pressure or a distraction from significant issues.

Mykola Solsky, while leading the Ministry of Agrarian Policy, has demonstrated his ability to enact reforms and support the agricultural sector. His initiatives aimed at the development of agriculture and support for domestic producers deserve attention and public support. The examples he has provided indicate his commitment to national interests and a desire to adhere to European standards in agriculture.

Ukrvinprom expresses its trust in the Ministry and its head, who have supported initiatives such as:

• Conducting a nationwide selection of official wine ambassadors for the Fund for Wine Culture and Civilization, Bordeaux
• The position of Ukrainian winemaking enterprises regarding the imposition of sanctions against legal entities and other related persons continuing active cooperation with the aggressor country.
• The position regarding the extension of the transitional period for the use of the GI “Cognac” for domestic producers
• Proposal for the creation of a control mechanism in the domestic grape and wine market, including imports, etc.
  
  

It is important to understand that the fight against corruption should be based on objective facts and adherence to the principles of legality. Publicity surrounding events related to allegations may create a negative impression of state institutions and contribute to the spread of stereotypes about corruption in Ukraine.

We believe that during times of war, it is important to unite and support government initiatives aimed at strengthening national security and country development. However, it is crucial to maintain the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food during this challenging time of complex negotiations and to preserve an objective approach to evaluating the actions of officials and avoid politicizing justice.

In light of the above, we do not support the court’s decision.